Merged
Conversation
…rezin/azure-rest-api-specs into Marketplace-miberezi-2020
|
Hi, @MiriBerezin Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips. Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. vsswagger@microsoft.com |
Swagger Validation Report
|
| Rule | Message |
|---|---|
| Since operation 'PrivateStore_GetApprovalRequestsList' response has model definition 'array', it should be of the form '_list'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. New: Microsoft.Marketplace/stable/2020-12-01/Marketplace.json#L113 |
|
| Since operation 'PrivateStore_AdminRequestApprovalsList' response has model definition 'array', it should be of the form '_list'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. New: Microsoft.Marketplace/stable/2020-12-01/Marketplace.json#L316 |
|
| 'GET' operation 'PrivateStore_AdminRequestApprovalsList' should use method name 'Get' or Method name start with 'List'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. New: Microsoft.Marketplace/stable/2020-12-01/Marketplace.json#L316 |
|
| 'PUT' operation 'PrivateStore_UpdateAdminRequestApproval' should use method name 'Create'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. New: Microsoft.Marketplace/stable/2020-12-01/Marketplace.json#L386 |
|
| Consider using x-ms-client-flatten to provide a better end user experience New: Microsoft.Marketplace/stable/2020-12-01/Marketplace.json#L937 |
|
| Based on the response model schema, operation 'PrivateStore_GetApprovalRequestsList' might be pageable. Consider adding the x-ms-pageable extension. New: Microsoft.Marketplace/stable/2020-12-01/Marketplace.json#L109 |
|
| Based on the response model schema, operation 'PrivateStore_AdminRequestApprovalsList' might be pageable. Consider adding the x-ms-pageable extension. New: Microsoft.Marketplace/stable/2020-12-01/Marketplace.json#L312 |
|
| OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'PrivateStoreModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'PrivateStore' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. New: Microsoft.Marketplace/stable/2020-12-01/Marketplace.json#L32 |
|
| OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'PrivateStoreModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'PrivateStore' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. New: Microsoft.Marketplace/stable/2020-12-01/Marketplace.json#L71 |
|
| OperationId has a noun that conflicts with one of the model names in definitions section. The model name will be disambiguated to 'PrivateStoreModel'. Consider using the plural form of 'PrivateStore' to avoid this. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. New: Microsoft.Marketplace/stable/2020-12-01/Marketplace.json#L113 |
️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Avocado.
️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️[Staging] Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on preview version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️⚠️[Staging] Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on stable version): 14 Warnings warning [Detail]
Only 10 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.
- Compared Swaggers (Based on Oad v0.8.6)
- original: stable/2020-01-01/Marketplace.json <---> new: stable/2020-12-01/Marketplace.json
| Rule | Message |
|---|---|
| The new version is missing a path that was found in the old version. Was path '/providers/Microsoft.Marketplace/privateStores/{privateStoreId}/offers' removed or restructured? Old: Microsoft.Marketplace/stable/2020-01-01/Marketplace.json#L19:5 |
|
| The new version is missing a path that was found in the old version. Was path '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/providers/Microsoft.Marketplace/privateStores/{privateStoreId}/offers' removed or restructured? Old: Microsoft.Marketplace/stable/2020-01-01/Marketplace.json#L61:5 |
|
| The new version is missing a path that was found in the old version. Was path '/providers/Microsoft.Marketplace/privateStores/{privateStoreId}/offers/{offerId}' removed or restructured? Old: Microsoft.Marketplace/stable/2020-01-01/Marketplace.json#L106:5 |
|
| The new version is missing a path that was found in the old version. Was path '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/providers/Microsoft.Marketplace/privateStores/{privateStoreId}/offers/{offerId}' removed or restructured? Old: Microsoft.Marketplace/stable/2020-01-01/Marketplace.json#L247:5 |
|
| The new version is missing a path that was found in the old version. Was path '/providers/Microsoft.Marketplace/privateStores' removed or restructured? Old: Microsoft.Marketplace/stable/2020-01-01/Marketplace.json#L333:5 |
|
| The new version is missing a path that was found in the old version. Was path '/providers/Microsoft.Marketplace/privateStores/{privateStoreId}' removed or restructured? Old: Microsoft.Marketplace/stable/2020-01-01/Marketplace.json#L375:5 |
|
| The new version is missing a path that was found in the old version. Was path '/providers/Microsoft.Marketplace/operations' removed or restructured? Old: Microsoft.Marketplace/stable/2020-01-01/Marketplace.json#L478:5 |
|
| The new version is missing a definition that was found in the old version. Was 'PrivateStoreOperation' removed or renamed? New: Microsoft.Marketplace/stable/2020-12-01/Marketplace.json#L468:3 Old: Microsoft.Marketplace/stable/2020-01-01/Marketplace.json#L548:3 |
|
| The new version is missing a definition that was found in the old version. Was 'PrivateStore' removed or renamed? New: Microsoft.Marketplace/stable/2020-12-01/Marketplace.json#L468:3 Old: Microsoft.Marketplace/stable/2020-01-01/Marketplace.json#L548:3 |
|
| The new version is missing a definition that was found in the old version. Was 'PrivateStoreProperties' removed or renamed? New: Microsoft.Marketplace/stable/2020-12-01/Marketplace.json#L468:3 Old: Microsoft.Marketplace/stable/2020-01-01/Marketplace.json#L548:3 |
️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
Swagger Generation Artifacts
|
|
Hi @MiriBerezin, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of
|
jorgecotillo
reviewed
Feb 1, 2021
...source-manager/Microsoft.Marketplace/stable/2020-12-01/examples/AcknowledgeNotification.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...source-manager/Microsoft.Marketplace/stable/2020-12-01/examples/GetApprovalRequestsList.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...urce-manager/Microsoft.Marketplace/stable/2020-12-01/examples/AdminRequestApprovalsList.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...cation/marketplace/resource-manager/Microsoft.Marketplace/stable/2020-12-01/Marketplace.json
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...cation/marketplace/resource-manager/Microsoft.Marketplace/stable/2020-12-01/Marketplace.json
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...cation/marketplace/resource-manager/Microsoft.Marketplace/stable/2020-12-01/Marketplace.json
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...cation/marketplace/resource-manager/Microsoft.Marketplace/stable/2020-12-01/Marketplace.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...cation/marketplace/resource-manager/Microsoft.Marketplace/stable/2020-12-01/Marketplace.json
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...cation/marketplace/resource-manager/Microsoft.Marketplace/stable/2020-12-01/Marketplace.json
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Contributor
|
Are your POST and PUT operations long running operations? If yes, you need to conform to this |
Contributor
Author
|
@jorgearteiro no, our APIs are NOT long-running operations |
Contributor
Ok. There's an important checkbox that was not marked: [] I have reviewed the documentation for the workflow. We'll let it pass this time, but future PRs if the documentation was not read prior creating the PR, the PR would not be reviewed. |
qianwens
approved these changes
Feb 2, 2021
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.
Changelog
Please ensure to add changelog with this PR by answering the following questions.
new API version for new APIs
Contribution checklist:
If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.
ARM API Review Checklist
Ensure to check this box if one of the following scenarios meet updates in the PR, so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to involve ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs, all “removals” and “adding a new property” no more require ARM API review.
Please ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
Breaking Change Review Checklist
If there are following updates in the PR, ensure to request an approval from API Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.
Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.